BLS - U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

06/16/2021 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 06/16/2021 13:14

Occupational Employment and Wages in Portland-South Portland - May 2020

News Release Information

21-1107-BOS
Wednesday, June 16, 2021

Workers in the Portland-South Portland, ME Metropolitan Statistical Area had an average (mean) hourly wage of $26.82 in May 2020, about 1 percent below the nationwide average of $27.07, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Regional Commissioner William J. Sibley noted that, after testing for statistical significance, wages in the local area were higher than their respective national averages in 5 of the 22 major occupational groups, including food preparation and serving related, personal care and service, and building and grounds cleaning and maintenance. Eleven groups had significantly lower wages than their respective national averages, including legal; computer and mathematical; and arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media.

When compared to the nationwide distribution, Portland area employment was more highly concentrated in 7 of the 22 occupational groups, including management, healthcare support, and healthcare practitioners and technical. Six groups had employment shares significantly below their national representation, including transportation and material moving; production, and installation, maintenance, and repair. (See table A.)

Major occupational group Percent of total employment Mean hourly wage
United States Portland United States Portland Percent difference

Total, all occupations

100.0 100.0 $27.07 $26.82 -1

Management

5.7 6.9* 60.81 56.59* -7

Business and financial operations

6.0 6.3 38.79 36.05* -7

Computer and mathematical

3.3 3.5 46.53 40.42* -13

Architecture and engineering

1.8 1.7 43.41 40.00* -8

Life, physical, and social science

0.9 0.8* 38.15 34.70* -9

Community and social service

1.6 1.9* 25.09 25.47 2

Legal

0.8 0.9 54.00 38.93* -28

Educational instruction and library

6.1 5.7 28.75 25.95* -10

Arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media

1.3 1.7* 30.96 25.72* -17

Healthcare practitioners and technical

6.2 6.8* 41.30 42.85 4

Healthcare support

4.6 5.5* 15.50 16.31* 5

Protective service

2.4 2.0* 25.11 22.75* -9

Food preparation and serving related

8.1 8.5* 13.30 15.40* 16

Building and grounds cleaning and maintenance

2.9 3.4* 15.75 17.04* 8

Personal care and service

1.9 2.2 15.68 17.63* 12

Sales and related

9.4 9.5 22.00 23.17 5

Office and administrative support

13.3 13.3 20.38 20.27 -1

Farming, fishing, and forestry

0.3 0.1* 16.02 18.41* 15

Construction and extraction

4.3 4.1 25.93 23.42* -10

Installation, maintenance, and repair

3.9 3.3* 25.17 24.33* -3

Production

6.1 4.9* 20.08 19.79 -1

Transportation and material moving

8.7 7.1* 19.08 18.76 -2

One occupational group-management-was chosen to illustrate the diversity of data available for any of the 22 major occupational categories. Portland had 13,560 jobs in management, accounting for 6.9 percent of local area employment, significantly higher than the 5.7-percent share nationally. The average hourly wage for this occupational group locally was $56.59, significantly below the national wage of $60.81.

Some of the larger detailed occupations within the management group included general and operations managers (4,210), financial managers (1,100), and marketing managers (930). Among the higher-paying jobs in this group were computer and information systems managers and natural sciences managers, with mean hourly wages of $68.21 and $78.45, respectively. At the lower end of the wage scale were education and childcare administrators, preschool and daycare ($22.49) and social and community service managers ($31.67). (Detailed data for the management occupations are presented in table 1; for a complete listing of detailed occupations available go to www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_76750.htm.)

Location quotients allow us to explore the occupational make-up of a metropolitan area by comparing the composition of jobs in an area relative to the national average. (See table 1.) For example, a location quotient of 2.0 indicates that an occupation accounts for twice the share of employment in the area than it does nationally. In the Portland area, above-average concentrations of employment were found in some of the occupations within the management group. For instance, marketing managers were employed at 2.4 times the national rate in Portland, and social and community service managers, at 1.5 times the U.S. average. Construction managers had a location quotient of 1.0 in Portland, indicating that this particular occupation's local and national employment shares were similar.

These statistics are from the Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) survey, a federal-state cooperative program between BLS and State Workforce Agencies, in this case, the Maine Department of Labor.

Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) Name Change

The Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) program has changed its name to Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) to better reflect the range of data available from the program. Data released on or after March 31, 2021, will reflect the new program name. Webpages, publications, and other materials associated with previous data releases will retain the Occupational Employment Statistics name.

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Impact on May 2020 Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Due to features of the OEWS methodology, the May 2020 OEWS estimates do not fully reflect the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The May 2020 OEWS estimates are based on survey panels collected for May 2020, November 2019, May 2019, November 2018, May 2018, and November 2017. Because 5 of the 6 survey panels used to produce the estimates date from before the COVID-19 pandemic, only the most recent (May 2020) survey panel reflects changes in occupational proportions related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The May 2020 OEWS employment estimates are benchmarked to the average of May 2020 and November 2019 employment from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). Although the May 2020 QCEW data reflect the early employment effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the November 2019 QCEW employment data precede the pandemic, and therefore do not reflect its impact.

In addition, as a result of the pandemic, response rates for the November 2019 and May 2020 panels were lower in some areas. Lower response rates may negatively affect data availability and data quality. More information is available at www.bls.gov/covid19/effects-of-covid-19-pandemic-on-occupational-employment-and-wage-statistics.htm.

Implementing the 2018 Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) System

With the May 2019 estimates, the OEWS program began implementing the 2018 Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. Because the May 2019 and May 2020 estimates are based on a combination of survey data collected using the 2010 SOC and survey data collected using the 2018 SOC, these estimates use a hybrid of the two classification systems that contains some combinations of occupations that are not found in either the 2010 or 2018 SOC. This is the second and final year that the hybrid occupational structure will be used. The May 2021 estimates, to be published in Spring 2022, will be the first OEWS estimates based entirely on survey data collected using the 2018 SOC. For more information on the occupational classification system used in the May 2019 and May 2020 estimates, please see www.bls.gov/oes/soc_2018.htm and www.bls.gov/oes/oes_ques.htm#qf10.

Upcoming Changes to the Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics Methodology

With the May 2021 estimates, to be released in Spring 2022, the OEWS program plans to begin using a new estimation methodology. The new model-based methodology, called MB3, has advantages over the existing methodology, as described in the Monthly Labor Review article at www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2019/article/model-based-estimates-for-the-occupational-employment-statistics-program.htm. OEWS estimates for the years 2015-2018 were recalculated using the new estimation methodology and are available as research estimates at www.bls.gov/oes/oes-mb3-methods.htm.


Technical Note

The Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) survey is a semiannual survey measuring occupational employment and wage rates for wage and salary workers in nonfarm establishments in the United States. The OEWS data available from BLS include cross-industry occupational employment and wage estimates for the nation; over 580 areas, including states and the District of Columbia, metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs), nonmetropolitan areas, and territories; national industry-specific estimates at the NAICS sector, 3-digit, most 4-digit, and selected 5- and 6-digit industry levels, and national estimates by ownership across all industries and for schools and hospitals. OEWS data are available at www.bls.gov/oes/tables.htm.

The OEWS survey is a cooperative effort between BLS and the State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). BLS funds the survey and provides the procedures and technical support, while the State Workforce Agencies collect most of the data. OEWS estimates are constructed from a sample of about 1.1 million establishments. Each year, two semiannual panels of approximately 180,000 to 185,000 sampled establishments are contacted, one panel in May and the other in November. Responses are obtained by mail, Internet or other electronic means, email, telephone, or personal visit. The May 2020 estimates are based on responses from six semiannual panels collected over a 3-year period: May 2020, November 2019, May 2019, November 2018, May 2018, and November 2017. The unweighted sample employment of 83 million across all six semiannual panels represents approximately 56 percent of total national employment. The overall national response rate for the six panels, based on the 50 states and the District of Columbia, is 69 percent based on establishments and 66 percent based on weighted sampled employment. The sample in the Portland-South Portland, ME Metropolitan Statistical Area included 2,279 establishments with a response rate of 72 percent. For more information about OEWS concepts and methodology, go to www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_tec.htm.

A value that is statistically different from another does not necessarily mean that the difference has economic or practical significance. Statistical significance is concerned with the ability to make confident statements about a universe based on a sample. It is entirely possible that a large difference between two values is not significantly different statistically, while a small difference is, since both the size and heterogeneity of the sample affect the relative error of the data being tested.

Metropolitan area definitions

The substate area data published in this release reflect the standards and definitions established by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget.

The Portland-South Portland, ME Metropolitan Statistical Area includes Arundel town; Baldwin town; Biddeford city; Buxton town; Cape Elizabeth town; Casco town; Chebeaque Island; Cornish town; Cumberland town; Dayton town; Durham town; Falmouth town; Freeport town; Frye Island; Gorham town; Gray town; Hollis town; Kennebunk town; Kennebunkport town; Limerick town; Limington town; Long Island town; Lyman town; Naples town; New Gloucester town; North Yarmouth town; Old Orchard Beach town; Portland city; Pownal town; Raymond town; Saco city; Scarborough town; Sebago town; South Portland city; Standish town; Waterboro town; Westbrook city; Windham town; Yarmouth town.

For more information

Answers to frequently asked questions about the OEWS data are available at www.bls.gov/oes/oes_ques.htm. Detailed information about the OEWS program is available at www.bls.gov/oes/oes_doc.htm.

Information in this release will be made available to individuals with sensory impairments upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.

Occupation Employment Mean wages
Level Location quotient Hourly Annual

Management occupations

13,560 1.2 $56.59 $117,710

Chief executives

400 1.4 90.64 188,530

General and operations managers

4,210 1.3 61.65 128,230

Advertising and promotions managers

40 1.3 47.81 99,440

Marketing managers

930 2.4 52.40 109,000

Sales managers

600 1.1 62.08 129,120

Public relations and fundraising managers

190 1.7 45.28 94,180

Administrative services and facilities managers

600 1.4 42.64 88,690

Computer and information systems managers

740 1.1 68.21 141,870

Financial managers

1,100 1.2 65.22 135,650

Industrial production managers

190 0.8 50.32 104,660

Purchasing managers

170 1.7 57.92 120,460

Transportation, storage, and distribution managers

200 1.1 47.47 98,740

Human resources managers

230 1.0 63.53 132,130

Training and development managers

30 0.6 49.41 102,780

Construction managers

420 1.0 40.46 84,150

Education and childcare administrators, preschool and daycare

80 1.2 22.49 46,780

Education administrators, kindergarten through secondary

340 0.9 97,920

Education administrators, postsecondary

170 0.8 43.35 90,170

Education administrators, all other

100 1.5 45.94 95,560

Architectural and engineering managers

390 1.4 62.62 130,250

Food service managers

340 1.2 32.24 67,070

Lodging managers

90 1.9 33.27 69,210

Medical and health services managers

680 1.2 48.08 100,010

Natural sciences managers

140 1.3 78.45 163,180

Postmasters and mail superintendents

30 1.6 37.05 77,070

Property, real estate, and community association managers

210 0.7 35.96 74,800

Social and community service managers

320 1.5 31.67 65,870

Personal service managers, all other; entertainment and recreation managers, except gambling; and managers, all other

570 0.9 58.18 121,020

View Chart Data