IPCC - Independent Police Complaints Commission

04/21/2021 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 04/21/2021 08:58

Devon and Cornwall Police officer found not guilty of offence under Communications Act

A Devon and Cornwall Police officer has been acquitted of the criminal offence of sending a grossly offensive image, a meme relating to George Floyd, following an Independent Office for Police Conduct(IOPC) investigation.

Sergeant Geraint Jones, 47, was found not guilty at the hearing before a district judge at Plymouth Magistrates' Court today. He had sent the image on 30 May 2020 to a WhatsApp group that included a number of other police officers and staff. The altered image inserted a naked adult film actor in the place of a police officer kneeling on the neck of George Floyd. The original image was widely reported and showed Mr Floyd as he was laying on the ground in Minneapolis shortly before his death.

Our investigationbegan in June 2020 following a referralfrom the force after one of the WhatsApp group members reported the image to their force manager. At its conclusion in October we sent our investigationreport to the Crown Prosecution Service which authorised the charge under S.127 of the Communications Act 2003.

IOPC regional director Catrin Evans said: 'At the end of our investigationwe submitted our report to the CPS as in our view there was an indication that a criminal offence had been committed. A district judge has now determined the officer's actions did not amount to a criminal offence. We also shared our report, which found the officer has a disciplinary case to answer for gross misconduct, with Devon and Cornwall Police. It will now be for the force to take forward disciplinary action.

'Criminal and disciplinary proceedings serve two different purposes. One is to determine whether someone has broken the law, and the other to determine whether an officer has breached police standards of professional behaviour. It will be for the police disciplinary process to determine whether the case against Sergeant Jones is proven and, if so, what the appropriate sanction is.'

In respect of other serving officers among the group, we found no case to answer for misconduct. However, Devon and Cornwall Police agreed with our view that the performance of two individuals did fall short of expectations. A detention officer, who could not be shown to have viewed the entire image, has received informal management actionfrom the force over their response to the message, and a sergeant is subject to reflective practice procedures for not reporting the matter straight away.

The force has since acted on recommendations made by the IOPC to strongly remind custody staff and the wider force of their expected behaviour under the police Code of Ethics and the Equality Act, and that they are duty bound to challenge and report inappropriate behaviour by any colleague. The force also agreed with our recommendation to take steps to ensure that all staff comply with national police guidance about posting comments or images on social media.

Our learning recommendations were:

  • The IOPC recommends that Devon and Cornwall Police take steps to ensure all officers and staff within Torquay Custody suiteand the wider organisation conform to the expectations of their behaviour under the Code of Ethics, whilst on and off duty, and promote a safe and open culture, which makes clear to officers and staff that they are duty bound to challenge and report behaviour that does not align with this Code.
  • The IOPC recommends that Devon and Cornwall Police take steps to ensure all officers and staff within Torquay Custody suiteand the wider organisation conform to the expectations of their behaviour under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010, whilst on and off duty, and promote a safe and open culture which makes clear to officers and staff that they are duty bound to challenge and report behaviour that does not align with this Act.
  • The IOPC recommends that Devon and Cornwall Police take steps to ensure all officers and staff within Torquay Custody suiteand the wider organisation are complying with the Association of Chief Police Officers' Guidelines on the Safe use of the Internet and Social Media by Police Officers and Police Staff 2013. They should also make clear to officers and staff that WhatsApp and other instant messaging platforms are considered forms of social media.

An act of parliament that provides the core framework of police powers to combat crime and provide codes of practice for the exercise of these powers.

Leads and manages the development of the police service in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

The body that represents the interests of all police constables, sergeants, and inspectors.

Deals with someone's inability or failure to perform to a satisfactory level, but without breaching the Standards of Professional Behaviour.

Focuses on putting an issue right and preventing it from happening again by encouraging those involved to reflect on their actions and learn. It is not a disciplinary process or a disciplinary outcome.

Department within a police force that deals with complaints and conduct matters.

Refers to lower-level misconduct or performance-related issues, which are dealt with in a proportionate and constructive manner.

This means doing what is appropriate in the circumstances, taking into account the facts and the context in which the complaint has been raised, within the framework of legislation and guidance.

The average is calculated using the individual results of the forces in that most similar force group.

An investigation carried out by IOPC staff.

Carried out by the police under their own direction and control. The IOPC sets the terms of reference and receives the investigation report when it is complete. Complainants have a right of appeal following a supervised investigation (unless it is an investigation into a direction and control matter).

This act sets out how the police complaints system operates.

How a police force is run, for example policing standards or policing policy.

An investigation carried out by the police under the direction and control of the IOPC.

The organisation that is responsible for assessing how to deal with a complaint. For example - whether it can be handled locally or reaches the criteria for referral to the IOPC. The appropriate authority may be the chief officer of the police force or the PCC for the force. If a complaint investigation finds that someone has a case to answer for misconduct, the appropriate authority is responsible for arranging any misconduct proceedings. If you make a complaint, the appropriate authority for your case will contact you.

An intelligence-led agency with law enforcement powers, it is also responsible for reducing the harm that is caused to people and communities by serious organised crime.

Policing bodies include police and crime commissioners, the Common Council for the City of London, or the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime.

Investigations carried out entirely by the police. Complainants have a right of appeal following a local investigation (unless it is an investigation into a direction and control matter).

IOPC guidance to the police service and police authorities on the handling of complaints.

A complaint or recordable conduct matter that doesn't need to be referred to the IOPC, but where the seriousness or circumstances justifies referral.

Parameters within which an investigation is conducted.

A person is adversely affected if he or she suffers any form of loss or damage, distress or inconvenience, if he or she is put in danger or is otherwise unduly put at risk of being adversely affected.

This is where a manager deals with the way someone has behaved. It can include: showing the police officer or member of staff how their behaviour fell short of expectations set out in the Standards of Professional Behaviour; identifying expectations for future conduct; or addressing any underlying causes of misconduct.

This could be the Police and Crime Commissioner, the Common Council for the City of London, or the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime.

A flexible process for dealing with complaints that can be adapted to the needs of the complainant. It may involve, for example, providing information and an explanation, an apology, or a meeting between the complainant and the officer involved.

A flexible process for dealing with complaints that can be adapted to the needs of the complainant. It may involve, for example, providing information and an explanation, an apology, or a meeting between the complainant and the officer involved.

A breach of standards of professional behaviour by police officers or staff so serious it could justify their dismissal.

A matter where no complaint has been received, but where there is an indication that a person serving with the police may have committed a criminal offence or behaved in a manner that would justify disciplinary proceedings.

Disapplication means that a police force may handle a complaint in whatever way it thinks fit, including not dealing with it under complaints legislation. This may only happen in certain circumstances where the complaint fits one or more of the grounds for disapplication set out in law.

The ending of an ongoing investigation into a complaint, conduct matter or DSI matter. An investigation may only be discontinued if it meets one or more of the grounds for discontinuance set out in law.

Quarter 1 covers 1 April - 30 June Quarter 2 covers 1 April - 30 September Quarter 3 covers 1 April - 31 December Quarter 4 covers the full financial year (1 April - 31 March).

You can request a review/appeal if you're not satisfied with how your complaint has been handled.

Used to house anyone who has been detained.

Complainants have the right to appeal to the IOPC if a police force did not record their complaint or notify the correct police force if it was made originally to the wrong force.

The purpose of an investigation is to establish the facts behind a complaint, conduct matter, or DSI matter and reach conclusions. An investigator looks into matters and produces a report that sets out and analyses the evidence. There are three types of investigations: local, directed and independent.

The ending of an ongoing investigation into a complaint, conduct matter or DSI matter. An investigation may only be discontinued if it meets one or more of the grounds for discontinuance set out in law.

The type of behaviour being complained about. A single complaint case can have one or many allegations attached.

A person who makes a complaint about the conduct of someone serving with the police.

The ending of an ongoing investigation into a complaint, conduct matter or DSI matter. An investigation may only be discontinued if it meets one or more of the grounds for discontinuance set out in law.

List of officers and staff who have been dismissed from policing, or would have been if they had not retired or resigned.

The type of behaviour being complained about. A single complaint case can have one or many allegations attached.

Disapplication means that a police force may handle a complaint in whatever way it thinks fit, including not dealing with it under complaints legislation. This may only happen in certain circumstances where the complaint fits one or more of the grounds for disapplication set out in law.

An independent judicial officer, the coroner enquires into deaths reported to him/her.

A breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour that would justify at least a written warning.

No further action may be taken with regard to a complaint if the complainant decides to retract their allegation(s).

A record is made of a complaint, giving it formal status as a complaint under the Police Reform Act 2002.

This is a format where information is written in plain English and short sentences.

The IOPC must be notified about specific types of complaint or incidents to be able to decide how they should be dealt with.

No further action may be taken with regard to a complaint if the complainant decides to retract their allegation(s).

Casework involves assessing appeals. Casework staff also have a role in overseeing the police complaints system to help ensure police forces handle complaints in the best possible way.

Disapplication means that a police force may handle a complaint in whatever way it thinks fit, including not dealing with it under complaints legislation. This may only happen in certain circumstances where the complaint fits one or more of the grounds for disapplication set out in law.

Conduct includes acts, omissions, statements and decisions (whether actual, alleged or inferred). For example: language used and the manner or tone of communications.

You can request a review/appeal if you're not satisfied with how your complaint has been handled.

You can request a review/appeal if you're not satisfied with how your complaint has been handled.