New report indicates a quarter of academic papers aren't preserved for the future

Whilst there are major scholarly digital archives in which material can be preserved, in a recent analysisby Martin Eve, Professor of Literature, Technology and Publishing at Birkbeck, of 7.5 million randomly chosen journal articles Martindiscoveredalmost 28% of articles appeared to have no preservation.

Martin Eve commented,"This work has revealed an alarming preservation deficit. Without active understanding and intervention, we will continue to lose valuable material and the existenceof digital links to scholarship and researchis threatened.

"Part of the problem appearsto stem from publishers not realisingitis their responsibility to digitally preserve, and alsothat smaller publishers with less revenue tend to have less robust preservation cultures, though this is not universally true. This suggests that the uneven distribution of wealth in the scholarly publishing industry, with a few very wealthy publishers, many impoverished ones and few in between, is placing material at risk of disappearing.

"Clearly, muchmore education is needed among publishers on the important matter of digital preservation. We also need, though, to think about the resourcing for digital preservation and find ways to level the playing field. There is, of course, always a cost in preserving material indefinitely. The uneven revenue distribution in scholarly communications should not be a barrier to the robust, long-term sustainability of digital material."

William Kilbride, of the Digital Preservation Coalition, welcomed the report: "Martin's findings are incredibly important. Publishers and libraries have been at the leading edge of digital preservation. We'vebeen arguing for years for urgent investment to ensure research remains viableagainst the fluctuating fortunes of the publishing industry. It'spleasing to see progress, but telling how much more there is to do."