ABCI Investments Limited v. Republic of Tunisia (ICSID Case No. ARB/04/12)

The Tribunal consents to the resignation of arbitrator Piero Bernardini pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 8(2) and the Secretary-General notifies the parties thereof.

Following the resignation of arbitrator Piero Bernardini, the Secretary-General notifies the parties of the vacancy on the Tribunal and the proceeding is suspended pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 10(2).

Following the resignation of Piero Bernardini, L. Yves Fortier (Canadian) accepts his appointment as arbitrator, appointed by the Claimant in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 11(1).

The Tribunal decides on the procedural calendar.

The Claimant files a memorial on quantum.

The Respondent files a counter-memorial on quantum.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant's request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Claimant files a response to the Respondent's observations of July 11, 2018.

Following the resignation of arbitrator Francisco Orrego-Vicuña (Chilean), the Secretary-General notifies the parties of the vacancy on the Tribunal and the proceeding is suspended pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 10(2).

The Secretary-General notifies the parties of the resignation of arbitrator Brigitte Stern (French).

The Respondent files a request for reconsideration of the Tribunal's decisions of February 18, 2011 and July 17, 2017.

Following the resignation of Francisco Orrego-Vicuña (Chilean), Bernard Hanotiau (Belgian) accepts his appointment as President of the Tribunal, appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 11(2).

The Tribunal consents to the resignation of arbitrator Brigitte Stern pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 8(2) and the parties are notified thereof.

The Tribunal is reconstituted. Its members are Bernard Hanotiau (Belgian), President, appointed by Chairman of the Administrative Council; Yves Fortier (Canadian), appointed by the Claimant; and Pierre Tercier (Swiss), appointed by the Respondent. The proceeding is resumed pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 12.

Following the resignation of Brigitte Stern (French), Pierre Tercier (Swiss) appointed by the Respondent, accepts his appointment as arbitrator in accordance with ICSID Rule 11(1).

The Tribunal issues a procedural order concerning procedural matters.

The Respondent files a memorial on reconsideration of the Tribunal's decisions of February 18, 2011 and July 17, 2017.

The Claimant files a response on reconsideration of the Tribunal's decisions of February 18, 2011 and July 17, 2017.

The Respondent files a reply on reconsideration of the Tribunal's decisions of February 18, 2011 and July 17, 2017.

The Claimant files a rejoinder on reconsideration of the Tribunal's decisions of February 18, 2011 and July 17, 2017.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files further observations on reconsideration of the Tribunal's decisions of February 18, 2011 and July 17, 2017.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant's request of April 4, 2019.

The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant's request of April 23, 2019.

The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Tribunal issues a procedural order concerning procedural matters.

The Claimant files a request for provisional measures.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant's request for provisional measures.

The Claimant files a response to the Respondent's observations of August 12, 2019.

The Respondent files further observations on the Claimant's response of August 27, 2019.

The Respondent files a request for provisional measures.

Each party files a request for provisional measures.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 9 concerning provisional measures.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 10 concerning provisional measures.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 11 concerning provisional measures.

The Claimant files a request for the Respondent to produce documents.

The Respondent files objections to the Claimant's request of October 18, 2019.

A non-disputing party files an application to file a written submission pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2).

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent's objections of October 21, 2019.

The Tribunal decides on the Respondent's objections of October 21, 2019.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant's request of October 18, 2019.

The Respondent files observations on the non-disputing party's application.

The Claimants files further observations on the request of October 18, 2019.

The Claimant files observations on the non-disputing party's application.

The Tribunal issues a procedural order concerning the Claimant's request of October 18, 2019 as completed on November 7, 2019.

The Tribunal issues a decision concerning the non-disputing party's application of October 22, 2019.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant's request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 14 concerning production of documents.

The Claimant files a reply on quantum.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent's response of May 20, 2020.

The Claimant files a further request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Respondent files a response to the Claimant's observations June 4, 2020.

The Claimant files further observations on the Respondent's response of June 15, 2020.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant's request of June 10, 2020.

The Respondent files a response to the Claimant's further observations of June 18, 2020.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Tribunal decides on the Respondent's request of June 19, 2020.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 15 concerning production of documents.

The Respondent files a rejoinder on quantum.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 16 concerning procedural matters. The proceeding is suspended until November 13, 2020, pursuant to the parties' agreement.

The suspension of the proceeding is extended until December 13, 2020, pursuant to the parties' agreement.

The suspension of the proceeding is further extended, pursuant to the parties' agreement.

The suspension of the proceeding is further extended, pursuant to the parties' agreement.

The suspension of the proceeding is further extended, pursuant to the parties' agreement.

The suspension of the proceeding is further extended, pursuant to the parties' agreement.

The suspension of the proceeding is further extended, pursuant to the parties' agreement.

The proceeding is resumed.

The Claimant files a request for provisional measures.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant's request for provisional measures of February 28, 2022.

The Claimant files a response to the Respondent's observations of March 8, 2022.

The Respondent files a reply to the Claimant's response of March 14, 2022.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 17 concerning provisional measures.

The Claimant files a recapitulative memorial on quantum.

The Respondent files a request for declaring parts of the Claimant's submission of May 30, 2022 inadmissible.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent's request of June 1, 2022.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 18 concerning the Respondent's request of June 1, 2022.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Claimant files observations on its request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files a recapitulative memorial on quantum.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant's request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 19 concerning the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files a request to strike part of the new evidence submitted by the Claimant.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent's request of September 19, 2022.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Oder No. 20 regarding the Respondent's request of September 19, 2022.

The Claimant files a request regarding the Respondent's expert evidence.

The Respondent files observations regarding the Claimant's request of September 29, 2022.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 21 regarding the Claimant's request of September 29, 2022.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant's request of October 4, 2022.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 22 concerning the admissibility of new evidence.

The Claimant files a request for reconsideration of Procedural Order No. 22.

The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by video conference.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant's request of October 10, 2022.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 24 concerning the organization of the hearing.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 23 concerning the request for reconsideration of Procedural Order No. 22.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 25 concerning procedural matters.

The Tribunal holds a hearing on quantum in Paris.

Each party files a post-hearing brief.

Each party files a submission on costs.

The Tribunal renders its award.

The Secretary-General registers an application for partial annulment of the award filed by ABCI Investments Limited and notifies the parties of the provisional stay of enforcement of the award.