WRI - World Resources Institute

04/16/2024 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 04/15/2024 22:05

Toward 'Better' Meat? Aligning Meat Sourcing Strategies with Corporate Climate and Sustainability Goals

Report

Toward "Better" Meat? Aligning Meat Sourcing Strategies with Corporate Climate and Sustainability Goals

This report helps consumer-facing food companies with climate and other sustainability goals plan to source not only "less meat" but also "better meat." Because "better meat" has many meanings, this report reviews evidence on the links between meat production, climate change, and other aspects of sustainability, looking across production practices and systems. It recommends six steps to help food companies meet multiple sustainability goals, from environmental impact measurement and sourcing strategy design to supplier engagement.

Topic
Food
Region
North AmericaEuropeApril 16, 2024 76 Pages

This Report is part of Food, Freshwater, Forests and Climate. Reach out to Richard Waite for more information.

This Report is part of Food, Freshwater, Forests and Climate. Reach out to Richard Waite for more information.

Authors
Richard Waite, Jessica Zionts and Clara Cho
Primary Contacts
License
Creative Commons

In places with high meat consumption, shifting diets toward plant-based foods can help food companies achieve climate and nature goals. There is also growing interest to accompany strategies that source "less meat" with strategies that source "better meat." However, "better meat" lacks a clear definition and can refer to environmental, social, ethical, and/or economic attributes. The "better meat" concept is also often tied to alternative agricultural production systems.

This report examines the different definitions and attributes of "better meat" and summarizes the results of academic research comparing the environmental performance of conventional and alternative animal production systems. Counterintuitively, production systems associated with "better meat" often result in higher environmental impacts per kilogram of protein, although animal welfare may improve. These results suggest that where "better meat" causes higher environmental impacts, strategies to source "less meat" may need to shift to source "even less meat." The report also examines strategies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from meat production.

This report recommends six steps that companies can take to design a sourcing strategy that will allow them to achieve climate and nature goals while also sourcing "better meat," to maximize co-benefits and minimize trade-offs:

1) Calculate the "scope 3" GHG emissions baseline of their food purchases, including meat.

2) Shift from high-emissions products like beef and lamb toward lower-emissions products like plant-based foods and alternative proteins.

3) Define meat sourcing priorities by product (e.g., lower-emissions beef, higher-welfare chicken).

4) Assess the potential environmental impacts of the new sourcing strategy on climate and other "better meat" priority goals.

5) If a "better meat" sourcing strategy increases environmental impacts, shift to sourcing "even less meat."

6) Engage with suppliers to improve practices and track progress.

Projects

Primary Contacts