11/25/2020 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 11/25/2020 05:04
Following a report submitted by the Directorate General for Competition Policy, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control (DGCCRF), the Autorité de la concurrence started proceedings ex officio into practices adopted by undertakings in response to calls for tenders issued by France AgriMer.
France AgriMer is a national public body operating in the agricultural and seafood product sector, which was set up in 2009. It develops strategies and management approaches in the agricultural and fisheries sectors in France. Each year, France AgriMer organises calls for tenders with a view to supplying food to charities and subsidised grocery stores notably, which then distribute the food to the most deprived sections of the population.
Between 2013 and 2016, several companies belonging to Ovimpex group (Dhumeaux, Mondial Viande Service, Vianov) submitted bids in response to calls for public tenders issued by France AgriMer. These bids, which were submitted as different and independent bids, were in fact drawn up jointly. After the statement of objections relating to anticompetitive practices had been notified by the Investigation Services, Dhumeaux, Mondial Viande Service, Ovimpex and Vianov requested initiation of a settlement procedure.
In accordance with its decision-making practice, which was confirmed by the case-law of the Paris Court of Appeal, the Autorité considered that fines could be handed out under rules prohibiting anticompetitive arrangements for practices consisting of submitting to the contracting authority bids that appear to be independent, but which have been prepared in a concerted manner by entities belonging to the same group.
However, in its Judgment of 17 May 2018« Ecoservice projektai » UAB, C‑531/16, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled, for the first time, that the provisions of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ('TFEU') do not apply to practices where companies belonging to the same group submit coordinated separate bids that appear to be independent in response to a call for tenders on the grounds that, in such a case, the companies concerned constitute a single economic entity, which preclude the classification of such practices as anticompetitive within the meaning of Article 101 of the TFEU.
This case-law has prompted the Autorité to amend its decision-making practice.
In this case, Dhumeaux, MVS and Vianov were subsidiaries that were almost wholly owned by Ovimpex, which was the group head at the time of the facts. These four companies, which were the parent company and subsidiaries of the group at the time of the facts, must therefore be regarded, in light of the case-law of the CJEU, as the same economic unit, notwithstanding the separate submission of bids in response to calls for tenders issued by France AgriMer.
The settlement procedure enables a company that does not contest the statement of objections notified by the Investigation Services of the Autorité to obtain a reduced fine. This procedure had given rise to the establishment of settlement proposals fixing the minimum and maximum amount of the fines that could have been handed out by the Autorité.
The Autorité consequently considered, notwithstanding the signature of the settlement proposals by concerned undertakings, that the conditions for handing out a fine had not been met and that there were no grounds to continue the proceedings.
See, for example, Decisions 03-D-07 of 4 February 2003 regarding practices identified in the transfer of purchase markets for vertical road signs by local communities ; 08-D-29 of 3 December 2008 regarding practices identified in the sector for the public procurement of metal and steelwork maintenance services; Decision 10-D-04of 26 January 2010 regarding practices implemented in the operating tables sector ; 18-D-02of 19 February 2018 regarding practices adopted in the sector for the maintenance of green spaces in Martinique.