Padilla Presses Deputy Attorney General Nominee During Nomination Hearing

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) questioned President Trump's nominee for U.S. Deputy Attorney General, Todd Blanche, during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Blanche was President Trump's personal attorney in several criminal cases, including Trump's New York hush money trial, in which the President was ultimately convicted of 34 felony counts. Padilla also condemned Trump's attempt to unlawfully fire more than a dozen Inspectors General, and raised concerns about conflicts of interest regarding Blanche and the top officials at the Justice Department's previous representation of Trump.

During the hearing, Padilla questioned Blanche on the Trump Administration's unlawful firings of 19 Inspectors General across federal government agencies. Inspectors General play a critical role in identifying and preventing fraud, waste, and abuse within executive branch agencies. Following passage of the Securing Inspector General Independence Act of 2022, led by Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Congress must be given the legally required 30-day notice and reasonings regarding the dismissals of Inspectors General, which the Trump Administration ignored. Blanche refused to comment on the matter, despite Chair Grassley agreeing that the Inspectors General firings, in fact, did not follow the law.

Padilla also voiced his concerns with Blanche's personal ties to President Trump, noting that he, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove could all face potential conflicts of interest since they all represented the President in a personal capacity.

Key Excerpts:

• PADILLA: When the President of the United States violates the law, it's important to call it out. And let me underscore, this isn't when the President of the United States strays from historical norms in how he or she does the job. It's not when the President does different than what's been standard practice for prior presidents. … I'm talking about when the President of the United States violates the law.

• PADILLA: Mr. Blanche, when you walked into my office, you repeatedly told me that you will always follow the law - your words, "full stop" - and you've repeated that same message here today. It's numerically, mathematically impossible for President Trump to have abided by the law in dismissing Inspectors General. Yes or no?

• BLANCHE: My answer remains the same. I'm not going to comment on what the decision made by the White House Counsel and President Trump, and what he did.

• PADILLA: I'm not talking about how they reached their decision. And you clearly know this is not a hypothetical. He didn't give Congress 30 days' notice, he violated the law, and I'm disappointed that you're failing to acknowledge that.

• PADILLA: My colleagues on the other side of the aisle have taken issue with us voicing our concern about President Trump filling the top ranks of the Justice Department with his friends, his allies, and personal attorneys. I can only imagine how they would have reacted if a Democratic President installed his own personal criminal defense attorneys as Attorney General, as Deputy Attorney General, as Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General.

Earlier this month, Senator Padilla joined U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats in demanding answers from Blanche and other Trump Administration nominees and officials on the removal or reassignment of career law enforcement officials across the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Padilla previously opposed advancing the nomination of Attorney General Pam Bondi after she refused to affirm birthright citizenship, which is constitutionally guaranteed, and declined to disavow the false claim that the 2020 election was stolen during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing. More information on Blanche's nomination hearing is available here.

###