Greater Ohio Policy Center

11/30/2021 | News release | Distributed by Public on 11/30/2021 11:15

From the Archives: Misconceptions About Vacant Property Registries

What is a VPRO?

Unoccupied buildings with the potential to deteriorate present local governments with high social and economic costs. Vacant Property Registration Ordinances (VPROs) seek to address the high rates of vacancy that have plagued many municipalities since the foreclosure crisis.

Vacant Property Registration Ordinances (VPROs) have three main objectives:

  • Ensure that owners of vacant properties are known to the city and other interested parties can be reached if necessary

  • Ensure owners of vacant properties are aware of their obligations of ownership under relevant city codes and regulations

  • Ensure owners meet a minimum standard of maintenance of their properties

Benefits of a VPRO


Funds generated through the Registry typically cover the costs of staff needed to properly staff enforcement of the Registry; in some cities (including small legacy cities) the fees generated are sufficient enough to fund 2+ code enforcement positions. For example, in Youngstown, it was estimated that increased compliance with vacant and rental registration could generate $739,920 in annual revenue - enough to support hiring several employees to manage the programs.[1]


In a fire or other emergency situation, first responders and emergency personnel are kept safer when they know if a building is vacant and the condition of the building's roof and interior. In Worcester, MA, known vacant industrial buildings (such as old textile mills) are included on the registry and display a large red "X" affixed to the side of the building to warn first responders to not enter or enter with caution. Research by the National Fire Protection Agency reports that vacant building fires cause a disproportionate share of firefighter injuries.[2]


Owners who keep their properties in a state of good repair and make good-faith efforts to find occupants for their properties may pay a fee to register their building, but that fee is used to aggressively pursue property owners who are not code compliant. Blight associated with numerous code violations has a negative externality on the health of the surrounding neighborhood. Research by GOPC and others has confirmed vacant homes, especially those that are left to deteriorate, greatly reduce the value of surrounding properties. VPROs are a proven strategy in reducing the number of vacant properties and encourage a healthier real estate market, which benefits everyone.

Common Misconceptions about VPROs


A modest fee is likely not going to change the cost-benefit analysis for a property owner, whether it is a local individual or part of a larger portfolio. Additionally, charging fees only when there is non-compliance with maintenance gives property owners an opportunity to never pay a fee even if their property remains vacant for a long period of time. And ultimately, even with no fee, the vacant property registry still provides a benefit of creating a record of what properties are vacant, where they are, and who owns them.


Some opponents of VPROs argue they raise the costs of property ownership as well as the costs of servicing delinquent loans and foreclosed properties.

The truth is, the costs imposed by a VPRO represent the true costs of owning and managing a vacant property. A VPRO shifts the costs of vacant properties away from neighborhoods and local governments and onto the appropriate private parties. By requiring the cost of a vacant property to be considered during underwriting decisions, a VPRO encourages responsible investment and lending while discouraging irresponsible investment and speculation.


If an owner of a vacant property finds $300 too burdensome to pay, it's unlikely they will invest the $30,000 required to redo their roof and mechanical systems. Meanwhile, as their vacant property deteriorates, the property values of neighboring properties will decline and the neighborhood's real estate market suffers.

The fact is, many more owners' property rights are infringed upon by a blighted and deteriorating building, than the property rights of the single owner of the vacant property.

Additionally, if the property owner is making good faith efforts to bring properties into code and/or to be occupied the city usually acknowledges those efforts and will work with the owner.


Non-compliance with the Registry can have legal ramifications, mainly increased fines that the city can eventually foreclose upon. After action is taken against one non-compliant owner, other owners usually fall in line.

Structuring a VPRO to a Community's Needs

Registration: Some cities require registration after a property has been vacant for a determined amount of time, while others require them to be registered after a foreclosure (the latter being aimed at mortgage lenders).

Fees: Some cities impose fees that escalate every year a property remains vacant and require property owners to provide plans for renovation or demolition (i.e. they must have a plan for the building). Other cities impose a small flat fee or no fee at all but impose penalties when property owners do not comply with basic maintenance rules.

Type of Property: Can apply only to residential, commercial or industrial or all three types of properties. Typically, commercial and industrial properties are treated the same as residential properties in VPROs.


For legacy cities dealing with long term vacancy, the model of requiring property registration after 45 days of being vacant is a good practice, since their vacancy issues go well beyond new foreclosures. The best systems are likely a combination of both: requiring registration at the time of foreclosure and for buildings that are vacant for 45+ days.

The fee structure is most likely the most critical component of a successful VPRO. The fee is the incentive for property owners to rehabilitate their properties. Typically, the fee ranges from $0 to over $600 per year. Some cities offer an option to waive the fee if the property owner provides plans for scheduled rehabilitating or demolition. Other cities offer a rebate on the fees a property owner pays once the vacant property is put back to use.

The fee structure is a fine line. In weak markets, the fee may cause property owners who are at least minimally paying taxes and maintain their properties to end up abandoning them.

The Center for Community Progress suggests that vacant property registration ordinance should include the following elements:

  • A clear definition of which properties and which parties must register;

  • The registration requirements and procedures, including the information required of the owner or lienholder;

  • The fee structure;

  • The obligations of the owner, with respect to maintaining the property; and

  • The penalties for failing to register in timely fashion.


Click here to view the VPRO language from Ashtabula, OH

Click here to view the VPRO language from Painesville, OH

Click here to view the VPRO language from Cleveland Heights, OH

Click here to view VPRO language from Sandusky, OH

Click here to view the registration form for a vacant property from Ashtabula, OH