PRCH - Physicians for Reproductive Choice and Health

03/28/2024 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 03/28/2024 09:22

PRH files Amicus Brief on EMTALA

This morning, Physicians for Reproductive Health, represented by Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, filed an amicus brief to the Supreme Court of the United States detailing how abortion restrictions, including Idaho's extreme abortion ban, can conflict with physicians' responsibilities under the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA).

PRH CEO & President Dr. Jamila Perritt along with six other PRH physician advocates from across the country provided their firsthand perspectives.

waiting to meet the life-threatening threshold before providing abortion care can jeopardize a pregnant patient's health…

The brief states, "Both courts and the medical community repeatedly have recognized that situations arise where 'stabilizing treatment' under EMTALA requires termination of a pregnancy. Under EMTALA, hospitals 'must provide medical care to stabilize all emergency patients,' including patients requiring abortion care. Yet emergency circumstances under EMTALA do not always meet the benchmark set by the Idaho Total Abortion Ban and similar laws, which allow abortion care only if, in that moment, it is 'necessary to prevent the death' of the pregnant patient. As demonstrated by the accounts of PRH physicians, even when medical conditions and complications are not considered imminently life-threatening, they can have serious consequences to patients' wellbeing and can become life-threatening if stabilizing intervention is withheld. Indeed, waiting to meet the life-threatening threshold before providing abortion care can jeopardize a pregnant patient's health…

"Rather than exercise their medical judgment while treating patients in emergency situations, physicians are now forced to make a series of challenging-and potentially criminal or career-ending-decisions about how to treat pregnant patients within both the confines of increasingly restrictive statutory law and their moral and professional medical obligations."

For firsthand accounts from our Fellows, Board Members, and President & CEO, read the full brief available here.